Nevermind. Once I located 'org-inlinetask.el' the answer was clear.


John

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:

[...]

> Yeah.. most of my todos aren't medium-sized projects, though. Many of them
> are more along the lines of one-liner action items I need to jot to myself
> so I don't forget as well as keeping them as a sort of rolling "next
> actions" queue. For that reason, I'd much rather keep them in their original
> context.

On possible suggestion: if you use inline tasks for these one liner
TODOs,


Perhaps that's the way to go. I just find them ugly :(
 
,----
| C-c C-x t runs the command org-inlinetask-insert-task, which is an
| interactive compiled Lisp function in `org-inlinetask.el'.
|
| It is bound to C-c C-x t.
|
| (org-inlinetask-insert-task &optional NO-STATE)
|
| Insert an inline task.
| If prefix arg NO-STATE is set, ignore `org-inlinetask-default-state'.
`----


This isn't working for me and it's been quite difficult to find mention of inline tasks in documentation. My searching only pulls a mention from the 6.29v list of visible changes: http://orgmode.org/Changes_old.html#sec-1_1_6

Is there something I need to set up to get this working?


Thanks,
John
 
You can then customise =org-inlinetask-export-templates= to
generate latex code that basically ignores the inline task.

--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.324.gca7a)