From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Horn <jrhorn424@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Need help with org and SSH
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:18:48 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinu60kGEVrTfcqj170gg78_5XFhYwK1nSHkfFK=@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimeKnSQNkvo0jWnbkCL2mrSNXc--qmteM_jBKzc@mail.gmail.com>
	<m162ulr93s.fsf@94.197.185.4.threembb.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59317 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PVTHL-00039T-Kw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:19:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jrhorn424@gmail.com>) id 1PVTHJ-0000qw-Uu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:19:11 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f48.google.com ([209.85.161.48]:39221)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jrhorn424@gmail.com>) id 1PVTHJ-0000qd-MR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:19:09 -0500
Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so5375972fxm.35
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:19:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m162ulr93s.fsf@94.197.185.4.threembb.co.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Dan Davison <dandavison7@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Dan Davison <dandavison7@gmail.com> wrote:

> The second one is lacking the fboundp protection. Does it help if you
> put the fboundp test in, as below?

Dan,

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried the patch and got a huge backtrace
full of binary characters. I don't know what is going on there, but
your patch should help...

I'd paste what I'm seeing but I don't know how to get text out of the
chrome shell and into the web browser...

-- 
Jeffrey Horn
Graduate Lecturer and PhD Student in Economics
George Mason University

(704) 271-4797
jhorn@gmu.edu
jrhorn424@gmail.com

http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/