From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa Subject: org+emacs vs CLI Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:43:18 -0600 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40547 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Po3aK-00071k-Nt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:43:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Po3a3-0007Ac-77 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:43:19 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:36188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Po3a2-0007AW-Uq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:43:19 -0500 Received: by iwc10 with SMTP id 10so3209045iwc.0 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:43:18 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode Hi list, Being a geek that I am, I ended up ditching Things.app in favor of org. However, being a geek also means being bombarded by other tools like Taskwarrior. Taskwarrior is great, but I don't think it can beat the speed of org + emacs, considering of course, you are already a seasoned emacs and org user. I do think CLI clients for org would be nice, as discussed in the taskwarrior thread, but really, IMO, emacs+org will always be faster to input and query org data. What do you think? Cheers, Marcelo.