From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Re: Splitting mailing list Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:12:12 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org> <20110228074935.bf0d7ebf.alantyree@gmail.com> <74194.1298847224@iu.edu> <87wrkk8mip.fsf@altern.org> <87pqqc8iin.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87bp1wqqg0.fsf@gnu.org> <24917.1298909684@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1875993180==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41120 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pu6e1-0001U7-6x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:12:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu6du-0000zn-0b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:12:22 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:64761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu6dt-0000zM-NY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:12:17 -0500 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so4525292bwz.0 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:12:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <24917.1298909684@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: mfo@abc.se, Bastien , "Andrew J. Korty" , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik --===============1875993180== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a938d5e156049d5ac7aa --001636c5a938d5e156049d5ac7aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Bastien wrote: > > > Julien Danjou writes: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote: > > >> I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O]. > > > > > > Couldn't you just drop it? > > > > > > Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous. > > > Not to me. > > Me either. The emails from this mailing list along account for 80% of my daily emails. With a tag and using gmail shortcuts, I can go down the list pressing j for next message and x to select it as I skim the titles to see if anything strikes me as of interest. When I have them all, I scan the senders and subjects once more to catch any accidental selections and then press # to delete. It would suck to actually read every subject to interpret it as mailing list or not *and* also be deciding if I wanted to open it. With the tag I just look for keywords like babel, beamer, lists, etc. to see if I think I'm interested. Mostly... I'm not. > > [fn:1] or [Org] or [O] - I would have preferred [Org] but I'm willing to > live with [O]. > Yeah, [O] seems weird to me even though there's nothing really wrong with it... I like [Org] more :) John > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > --001636c5a938d5e156049d5ac7aa Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@= hp.com> wrote:
Bastien <bzg@altern.org> wrote:=

> Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.= info> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
> >> I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
> >
> > Couldn't you just drop it?
> >
> > Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
>
Not to me.


Me either.

Th= e emails from this mailing list along account for 80% of my daily emails. W= ith a tag and using gmail shortcuts, I can go down the list pressing j for = next message and x to select it as I skim the titles to see if anything str= ikes me as of interest. When I have them all, I scan the senders and subjec= ts once more to catch any accidental selections and then press # to delete.= It would suck to actually read every subject to interpret it as mailing li= st or not and=A0also be deciding if I wanted to open it.

With the tag I just look for keywords like babel, beame= r, lists, etc. to see if I think I'm interested. Mostly... I'm not.=
=A0

[fn:1] or [Org] or [O] - I would have preferred [Org] but I'm willing t= o
live with [O].

Yeah, [O] seems weird to= me even though there's nothing really wrong with it... I like [Org] mo= re :)


John
=A0


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

--001636c5a938d5e156049d5ac7aa-- --===============1875993180== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1875993180==--