From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Torsten Wagner Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:09:14 +0900 Message-ID: References: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0330355989==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55569 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTvbB-00079P-Nm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 07:09:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTvbA-0007zy-87 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 07:09:17 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:51479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTvbA-0007zf-3K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 07:09:16 -0500 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so1525205wwb.30 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 04:09:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-mode ml --===============0330355989== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300260a4cd2b660497ae27ae --20cf300260a4cd2b660497ae27ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for all the answers and discussions. To summarise: I guess nobody is interest to split the list. At least no dev mentioned a need. Tags are good but might need some guidance to use a certain set and possibly shorten them wherever possible. The issue with to long tag list is not only a problem for people with large fonts. Many of us start to read mails on our smartphones where space is limited as well. Using [Orgmode] as a tag on the orgmode list is an arguable point. Maybe the someone higher in the queue like to make a decision to shorten it to [Org]. I would like to start to write something in worg and then we might see how useful it is. Best regards Torsten --20cf300260a4cd2b660497ae27ae Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for all the answers and discussions.
To summarise:
I guess nob= ody is interest to split the list. At least no dev mentioned a need.
Tag= s are good but might need some guidance to use a certain set and possibly s= horten them wherever possible.
The issue with to long tag list is not only a problem for people with large= fonts. Many of us start to read mails on our smartphones where space is li= mited as well.
Using [Orgmode] as a tag on the orgmode list is an arguab= le point. Maybe the someone higher in the queue like to make a decision to = shorten it to [Org].
I would like to start to write something in worg and then we might see how = useful it is.

Best regards
Torsten

--20cf300260a4cd2b660497ae27ae-- --===============0330355989== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============0330355989==--