From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathaniel Flath Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Alphabetical ordered lists Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:44:45 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87bp8o498o.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <393C5110-E4D3-4B36-8F4E-4F94B5AA0F93@gmail.com> <87k4m876g3.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87iq1r7k00.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <747F5104-6B1C-43E8-BF42-883287B7E303@gmail.com> <87aan0789y.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <874od127wq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <535BC60F-1310-47AD-BCD1-1C88822B852A@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34300 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8n1E-0007mp-IB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:44:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8n1D-0007Jy-Ah for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:44:48 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:37568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8n1D-0007Jm-8J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:44:47 -0400 Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so437837qwd.0 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:44:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <535BC60F-1310-47AD-BCD1-1C88822B852A@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Bernt Hansen , Jacob Mitchell , org-mode List , Nicolas Goaziou > >> >> But I can't help thinking this could lead to unexpected results in >> some cases (admittedly less than when alpha bullets could be any size >> long). > > It definitely will. > > Here is an alternative idea. =A0Nathaniel, what do you > think about this: We could keep the numbering as we > have it in the Org file, but introduce something like [@a] > in the first item that will convert the numbering > into a,b,... upon export to ASCII, HTML, maybe even LaTeX > (even though I think LaTeX demands some consistency here > and prefers to have the global setup decide how lists work). > Hell, we could even use [@A] for capitals and [@i] and [@I] > for roman numbering :) > > - Carsten > Sorry for the late response - got swamped with work for a bit. I'd much prefer the approach I've been going with, mostly since I don't usually export my notes and mostly view them in org-mode. I'll work on the patch tonight - should send a patch either later tonight or tomorow. Thanks, Nathaniel Flath