Re: Simple wiki system like VIMWiki

[Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celoserpa@gmail.com>]

Is no one interested in such feature?

Marcelo.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
<celoserpa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Forgot to add the link to VIMWiki:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/vimwiki/
>
> Regards,
>
> Marcelo.
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
> <celoserpa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I've started using vim lately for my programming needs and I love it,
>> mostly because the motion and shortcuts are much more efficient. That
>> aside, I still think emacs is a great platform and text-editor and I
>> still use it for other stuff, mainly organizing myself (thanks to
>> orgmode).
>>
>> Most of the todo/GTD stuff is well handled by org, but I do find that
>> for reference and brainstorming, a real-time (and straightforward)
>> wiki is the best solution. I have been managing to keep things simple
>> by keeping all my reference org files under a (/wiki) folder and
>> setting peepopen (an OSX cocoa fuzzy-finder
>> (http://peepcode.com/products/peepopen)) to index specifically this
>> folder and bound this to Command-w, and it works great for getting a
>> quick index of the wiki and quickly open a file from it.
>>
>> However, linking and creating new files is far from optimal. Org-mode
>> still tries to keep things at the headline-level, instead of at file
>> level. This works, but for me,  not so well. Why? The simple fact that
>> org asks me if I want to create a target in the current file or in a
>> another file already gets me out of the zone. I prefer some convetion
>> over configuration.
>>
>> It'd be nice if org had, for example, a more org-like wiki (like
>> wikinodes) and a more traditional one (like VIMwiki). Not sure if
>> there's another mode I could combo with org that would give the
>> functionality I want, I'm open to suggestions :)
>>
>> Marcelo.
>>
>