From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Horn Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:07:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59731 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfcRd-0006mU-0E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:07:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfcRb-0008C2-UQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:07:44 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:42207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfcRb-0008Bp-Pp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:07:43 -0500 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so1126428fxm.0 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:07:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Bastien , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jason Dunsmore wrote: > I think this might be unnecessary (hitting "Back", typing the "Home" > key, or middle clicking at the top of the scroll bar can all already do > this). I'm not an expert, but that is not very "accessible". Shouldn't be a problem with modern text browsers, but I remember this being an accessibility recommendation for FAQish pages at my previous university. -- Jeffrey Horn http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/