should show-branches fold subtree?

should show-branches fold subtree?

[Ali Tofigh]

hi everyone,

i often use C-c C-k (org-kill-note-or-show-branches) in org-mode when
i want to see only the headings under a subtree (i.e., no text in the
bodies). however, i get the desired effect only when applying C-c C-k
to already folded subtrees. this means i have to first fold the
subtree using TAB and only then do C-c C-k. i could always add my own
custom command or keybinding to go around this, but what is the reason
that show-branches doesn't hide subtrees but only expands folded ones?
isn't the command more useful if it also hides text?

cheers,
/ali

Re: should show-branches fold subtree?

[Carsten Dominik]

Hi Ali,

this makes sense, and it is now working like this.

- Carsten

On May 20, 2010, at 2:42 AM, Ali Tofigh wrote:

> hi everyone,
>
> i often use C-c C-k (org-kill-note-or-show-branches) in org-mode when
> i want to see only the headings under a subtree (i.e., no text in the
> bodies). however, i get the desired effect only when applying C-c C-k
> to already folded subtrees. this means i have to first fold the
> subtree using TAB and only then do C-c C-k. i could always add my own
> custom command or keybinding to go around this, but what is the reason
> that show-branches doesn't hide subtrees but only expands folded ones?
> isn't the command more useful if it also hides text?
>
> cheers,
> /ali
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

- Carsten

Re: should show-branches fold subtree?

[Ali Tofigh]

great! and thank you for all the work you, and all the other
contributers, are doing on org-mode. i don't think i can live without
org-mode anymore. it's like a drug!

/ali

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 03:40, Carsten Dominik
<carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> this makes sense, and it is now working like this.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On May 20, 2010, at 2:42 AM, Ali Tofigh wrote:
>
>> hi everyone,
>>
>> i often use C-c C-k (org-kill-note-or-show-branches) in org-mode when
>> i want to see only the headings under a subtree (i.e., no text in the
>> bodies). however, i get the desired effect only when applying C-c C-k
>> to already folded subtrees. this means i have to first fold the
>> subtree using TAB and only then do C-c C-k. i could always add my own
>> custom command or keybinding to go around this, but what is the reason
>> that show-branches doesn't hide subtrees but only expands folded ones?
>> isn't the command more useful if it also hides text?
>>
>> cheers,
>> /ali
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
> - Carsten
>
>
>
>

Re: should show-branches fold subtree?

[Juri Krivov]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 242 bytes --]

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Carsten Dominik
<carsten.dominik@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Ali,
>
> this makes sense, and it is now working like this.
>
> - Carsten

Great!  I have also wanted this key to work more consistently.  Thanks!

Juri

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 532 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode