On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Richard Lawrence
<
richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Jeff Horn <
jrhorn424@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> I'm not trying to be antagonistic, or insensitive to your particular
>>> situation. But since no one else has said it, I just wanted to point
>>> out that it might be easier or more efficient, in terms of overall
>>> person-hours, to convert from Word to Org, rather than the other way
>>> around.
>>
>> If they're stuck in word and the OP is using org, he may be the only
>> person on his team capable of changing his workflow. In that case,
>> person hours are saved if he switches and doesn't have to educate
>> everyone else (or they educate themselves), though *his* man hours are
>> not economized.
>
> Well, doesn't that depend on how long it would take to educate everyone
> else, vs. how many hours he will eventually spend doing manual
> conversion to Word?