On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Thorsten <
gruenderteam.berlin@googlemail.com> wrote:

> John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I've used Lilypond and think it's amazing. But... what advantage is
> > having it in org? Just curious... integration in foldable headlines
> > and src blocks? For my uses, I can't think of a purpose unless, I
> > guess, I was doing in-document scores or bars like in a wedding
> > program or something. What was your idea -- I'm interested.
> >
> > John
>
> I thought about writing a music book with the typesetting done by LaTex
> and Lilypond. I know it should work just like combining R and LaTex with
> Sweave, but the last time I tried I had problems - integration in Org
> could make it easy. And, since nowadays books are shared on the web for
> free and the author starves, one might want to reuse the content in the
> setting of an online music school. Orgmode's html export would make this
> easy.
>
>
Cool -- this was along my thoughts. I like it! I agree it can't be that hard
to integrate. It's a pretty simple markup.

John


> Thorsten
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>