From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Valentin_W=C3=BCstholz?= <wuestholz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASCII export: Fixed a bug.
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:15:37 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=i7DpL+kVLq+gsrXMu2ZbpnQRmC-18S37nusj-@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikw3vamENTzQ6hNKiWyOioT04O03dPqCs9DQdbz@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pqqw17mt.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58889 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Poarx-0003Pk-UN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:16:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wuestholz@gmail.com>) id 1Poarw-0001T0-T8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:16:02 -0500
Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:49210)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wuestholz@gmail.com>) id 1Poarw-0001Sq-Ol
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:16:00 -0500
Received: by vxb41 with SMTP id 41so2060609vxb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 04:15:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87pqqw17mt.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Basten,

thanks. Is there a reason for keeping the 'reverse' operation? The
documentation for org-export-ascii-underline states that the
characters are ordered by level (1, 2, ...). Why should they be
accessed in reverse order then?

Best regards,

Valentin


On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr> wro=
te:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> Valentin W=C3=BCstholz <wuestholz@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I have attached a small patch for a bug that I reported a while ago.
>> See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/36097.
>
> Thanks for this patch. =C2=A0I've just applied a simplified version of it=
,
> which takes care of the bug.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> =C2=A0Bastien
>