Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

[Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>]

More clearly:

  1) The conversation manager is basically superseded by the ID
markers idea.  That is, you can implement it trivially once ID markers
are implemented.
  2) What you are doing is not related to the conversation manager.

On 2010-08-28, Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi K,
>
> Indeed, if that is what you want to do, you can do it without too much
> effort, I think.  The conversation manager is a bit different, but
> similar.
>
> I have not looked at the conversation manager idea for some time.  At
> the time I also wrote (and still have) more notes on it.  If anybody
> is interested in the conversation manager, let me know.
>
> There are many future possibilities for the conversation manager.
>
> ===> But please note the following <===
>
> The most important thing is that in the meantime I came up with the
> idea of ID markers, which actually significantly simplify these issues
> and allow a large set of other possibilities, simultaneously.
>
> So, if what you are doing is similar to the conversation manager (as
> opposed to org-add-note or tweaks to allow capture to capture to
> point, for example), then I think it is best for me to dredge out my
> notes on ID markers (but you can visit my posts on them and get the
> main idea).  My health is not up to doing a lot on it now, however, so
> I would just post what I already did.
>
> If what you are doing is different, such as getting org-capture to
> capture to point, then it's probably not relevant.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Samuel
>
> On 2010-08-18, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In the context of the original post, is there a possible way to do this.
>>
>> 1. I mark a TODO entry in todo.org as done.
>>
>> 2. An org-id (say ID-TODO) gets created for the TODO entry if there is
>>    none yet.
>>
>> 3. The state transition to DONE triggers a capture rule. The
>>    conversation is collected in a capture buffer and filed as a heading
>>    under conversation.org.    An org-id (say ID-CONV) is generated for
>>    the captured entry.
>>
>> 4. ID-TODO is noted in the conversation.org
>> 5. ID-CONV is noted down in todo.org
>>
>> Jambunathan K.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb?
> A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for 25
> years]
> ==========
> Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html -- PLEASE DONATE
> ===
> PNAS must publish the original Lo and Alter NIH/FDA XMRV paper
> verbatim along with the new paper.
>


-- 
Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly serious
disease for 25 years]
==========
Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html -- PLEASE DONATE
===
I would like to see the original Lo et al. 2010 NIH/FDA XMRV paper.