Re: FR: Using properties to customize global settings on a per-entry basis

[Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>]

On Oct 4, 2007, at 13:24, Bastien wrote:

> Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
>
>>>> * repetitive entry
>>>>   :PROPERTIES:
>>>>      :org-log-done: nil
>>>>   :END:
>>>
>>> Sounds like a great way to do it!
>>
>> The alternative would be a LOGGING property where you could set the 
>> same
>> keywords as in the STARTUP line.  What is better?
>>
>
> I think using LOGGING is a bit better.

So what do I do?  More votes?

>
> BTW, this is documented in (info "(Org)In-buffer settings") :
>
> | logging          | record a timestamp when an item is marked DONE    
>   |
> | nologging        | don't record when items are marked DONE           
>   |
> | lognotedone      | record timestamp and a note when DONE             
>   |
> | lognotestate     | record timestamp and a note when TODO state 
> changes |
> | logrepeat        | record a note when re-instating a repeating item  
>   |
> | nologrepeat      | do not record when re-instating repeating item    
>   |
> | lognoteclock-out | record timestamp and a note when clocking out     
>   |
>
> But the docstring of `org-log-done' doesn't mention all these options.

logrepeat and nologrepeat actually refer to a different variable, 
org-log-repeat.
I have improved the docs there.

> And (info "(Org)Progress Logging") should mention all these option
> somewhere, or at least link back to the in-buffer settings back.

They are all mentioned now, in the right places.

Thanks.

- Carsten