From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:02:04 -0400 Message-ID: <9991.1320159724@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <30891.1319141196@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87fwinifqu.fsf@gmail.com> <32184.1319143892@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87zkgvgxe7.fsf@gmail.com> <1405.1319147324@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87zkgvfhra.fsf@gmail.com> <2127.1319148505@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87vcrjfgt1.fsf@gmail.com> <80sjmmvm60.fsf@somewhere.org> <4EA129DB.4070006@christianmoe.com> <8762ji5jr6.fsf@gmail.com> <4EA1D4F9.5010302@christianmoe.com> <4ea1de9c.67b4ec0a.553d.122a@mx.google.com> <87aa8t10np.fsf@gmail.com> <4ea5a95b.059dec0a.606e.0c92@mx.google.com> <874nypkn6y.fsf@gmail.com> <87obwwkia5.fsf@gmail.com> <87boswk4vj.fsf@gmail.com> <8627.1320157576@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLFqy-0008DW-Rx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:02:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLFqq-000503-OD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:02:16 -0400 Received: from g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.62]:20240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLFqq-0004zU-Ki for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:02:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Nick Dokos of "Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:26:16 EDT." <8627.1320157576@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Nick Dokos wrote: > Can we please back off this path? In order to prevent confusion or needless argument: the path I think we should back off of is the committing of these changes to master - I think the work should be done in a branch and cooked thoroughly before merging it to master. I did not mean to imply (although I think one could easily get that impression from my mail) backing off the property implementation (despite my personal reservations about that). Nick