Hi Ben, you correctly analyzed that this has something to do with the space character after the the dot. Org considers a number with a dot as an ordered list bullet only if it is followed by a space character. Otherwise, any number like 1.23 at the beginning of a line would be considered a bullet. The reason why Bernt could not reproduce it is because you use `org- cycle-include-plain-lists' (you forgot to mention that...) and he probably does not. - Carsten On May 5, 2008, at 11:40 PM, bva@alexanderonline.org wrote: > This is odd, but since I've not yet taken the time to update my org- > mode to the latest version, perhaps this is a non issue. Would > someone with an up-to-date version try this out. > > org-version reports: Org-mode version 5.23a > > version reports: GNU Emacs 22.1.50.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0, > Carbon Version 1.6.0) of 2007-10-02 on applecore.inf.ed.ac.uk - > Aquamacs Distribution 1.2a > > > I have the following list under a headline, with blank entries: > > *** Vacation Days > 1. <2008-03-20 Thu> > 2. > 3. > 4. > 5. > 6. > > If I (fold and then) unfold the headline to "CHILDREN", I see the > following: > > *** Vacation Days > 1. <2008-03-20 Thu>... > 3. > 4. ... > 6. > > This looks odd to me: item number 2 is folded, as is item number 5. > It looks like an out of sequence list, so I tried to renumber it > using C-c C-c. Then I see: > > *** Vacation Days > 1. <2008-03-20 Thu>...2. > 3. > 4. ...5. > 6. > > In recreating this, I discovered my inconsistency which seems to > cause this: line items number 2 and 5 do not have a space after > their period. Add some spaces, and there is no weirdness. Take all > the spaces away, and then "CHILDREN" folded headlines look like: > > *** Vacation Days > 1. <2008-03-20 Thu>... > > Now that I know that what looked like an 'out of sequence' list is > just folded in a weird way, I'm over it. I can certainly add the > place holder space when I create blank line items manually (they are > added automatically when I use M-. But it is curious, and > probably unexpected behavior. Is this easy to fix or has it already > been fixed in the current update? > > Maybe no fix is required. > > -Ben > > (And thanks again for org-mode, and the mailing list too!) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode