From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [PATCH] org.el: Don't flyspell check within source code blocks Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:23:43 +0200 Message-ID: <8EF35A36-9F1D-4FD7-84A2-9447961AC55E@gmail.com> References: <1369466246-5113-1-git-send-email-trevor.m.murphy@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFebB-0004so-K7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 02:23:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFeb6-0004jH-8B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 02:23:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::229]:50044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFeb6-0004j9-1b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 02:23:48 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k11so1292329eaj.28 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:23:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1369466246-5113-1-git-send-email-trevor.m.murphy@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Trevor Murphy Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 25.5.2013, at 09:17, Trevor Murphy wrote: >=20 > Hi, list. >=20 > I recently started using flyspell, but I wasn't pleased with the spell > checking in my source code blocks. After digging a bit for a > solution, I found a post to the list with a nice solution[0]. > However, it seems no patch was ever submitted. So, here goes. >=20 > If there's a deeper reason this part of the code was never changed, > please enlighten me. I didn't see any further mailing list > discussion, so I assumed it was still fair game. Hi Trevor, I would be worried that this has noticeable impact in Emacs performance = during normal typing. Are you a fst typist? Have you noticed anything = in this direction? Thanks! - Carsten >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Trevor >=20 > [0]: = http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-12/msg00764.html >=20