From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] #+begin_src wo. language blocks XHTML export
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:37:57 -1000
Message-ID: <8BFEB2A8-C320-475C-861D-6FDF1F74AB50@tsdye.com>
References: <87fx0abtr1.fsf@gmx.de> <87mxu7nxoy.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<87iq4uzynf.fsf@gmx.de> <87r5jdsscu.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51129 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OWwv8-00049X-Nx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:38:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1OWwv7-00012R-7L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:38:06 -0400
Received: from oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.60]:33735)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>)
	id 1OWwv7-00011n-0R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:38:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87r5jdsscu.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: Emacs-orgmode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:

> Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de> writes:
>
> [...]
>>
>> It can be considered an error, since the docs say:
>>
>>  "...This is done with the =91src=92 block, where you also need to =20=

>> specify
>>  the name of the major mode that should be used to fontify the
>>  example..."
>>
>
> I would vote that this be considered an error as a source block =20
> doesn't
> make sense w/o a source language.  If others agree with this
> interpretation, I would be happy to submit a patch which actively =20
> raises
> an errors when this cases is encountered.
>
> Cheers -- Eric

This seems like the right approach to me.

Tom=