Re: Re: Org-mode Code Blocks Manuscript: Request For Comments

["Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>]

Aloha Seb,

Thanks for your detailed and thorough review.  Your comments will help  
us revise the paper.  Much appreciated.

All the best,
Tom

On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Let's see if I'm a good proof-reader. Here are my comments, looking  
> at things
> not already said by others:
>
> Page 1 -- "... desirable to mix prose, (add input data?,) code, and
> computational results."
>
> Page 3 -- It'd be better not to have commas in front of the Org-mode  
> block in
> Figure 1.
>
> Page 9 -- You say that "tags and properties of a node are inherited  
> by its
> sub-nodes". I agree for tags, not for properties (at least, by  
> default).
>
> Page 10 -- "Active code blocks are marked with a source line,  
> followed by a
> name unique within the document". Why don't you call such "named  
> code blocks"
> as in Babel's code base?
>
> BTW, what happens if there is a name clash with other code blocks  
> (in the same
> document, or in the LOB)?  Though, this is not for your paper...
>
> Page 12 -- When results is set to output, what do you mean by  
> "collected from
> STDOUT incrementally"?  Not sure about the added value of  
> incrementally...
>
> Page 16 -- I find the name of the code block "ps-to-dot" very badly  
> chosen. PS
> makes me think of PostScript, while you mean here Pascal's triangle...
>
> Page 17 -- In the LaTeX ATTR, better use linewidth instead of  
> textwidth. This
> is a more secure setting.
>
> Page 18 -- Is the default value of var (1 2 1) compliant with the  
> "pass" table
> beneath it?
>
> Side comment -- Wouldn't you use a standard way of handling the  
> acronyms in
> LaTeX, so that they're expanded when required, and listed at the end  
> of the
> document?  Example of such acro: ESS.
>
> For the rest, an excellent document, but not that good (IMHO) for  
> publishing
> to a statistics journal. For doing so, I find you'd have to only  
> include R
> examples, and show that you can do everything Sweave can do, and  
> even much
> more. But I would focus on stats a lot more than it is here.
>
> But, the way it is written, it is much more general, and offers a  
> much widen
> view. So, this is excellent, but for another audience.
>
> Best regards,
>  Seb
>
> -- 
> Sébastien Vauban
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode