From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:21:16 -0400
Message-ID: <8953.1338319276@alphaville>
References: <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> <7321.1338312260@alphaville>
	<7863.1338313608@alphaville> <samologist@gmail.com>
	<CAJcAo8tggxX2iZgA-ukWhDtT=71BzL6SEd0cSM19s6dhVq15FQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<8492.1338316991@alphaville>
	<CAJcAo8taDM28r78xB3P0cmMLMaoSxxeLLVe_PL7jkj1eWsaA3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<8836.1338318928@alphaville>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47440)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SZRyw-0002tf-Rr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 15:21:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SZRys-00026K-3V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 15:21:26 -0400
Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:29708)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SZRyr-00024y-Ut
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 15:21:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
	of "Tue, 29 May 2012 15:15:28 EDT." <8836.1338318928@alphaville>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:

> ...
>
> I haven't gone to gmane looking for the discussion, but if one of the
> principals involved remembers the reason, maybe they can enlighten us.
> 

I found the discussion on gmane - check the thread starting at

   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/45243

Nick