From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao-Yong Jin Subject: Re: Release 5.23a Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:52:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87zlt66n8u.fsf@columbia.edu> References: <876ACC10-F511-4735-B045-9C9AE248A25A@gmail.com> <47D5CC47.40107@cornell.edu> <87ve3urtzq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <47D5D90E.8010508@cornell.edu> <87myp683ix.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYtg7-00074h-Px for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:53:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYtg6-000745-BP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:53:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYtg6-000740-21 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:53:18 -0400 Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu ([128.59.29.6]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYtg5-0002Bb-Lx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:53:17 -0400 Received: from latticeqcd (dyn-carl-202-28.dyn.columbia.edu [160.39.202.28]) (user=xj2106 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2B1rAMC017284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:53:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87myp683ix.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:15:18 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien Guerry writes: > Xin Shi writes: > >> Is that possible to make it kill the buffer on the C-c C-e h case? Or >> let user to customize this behavior? I don't know the reason to keep >> that buffer in this case. > > I don't know what the default should be, I have no personal preference. > I think it's quite useful to have the exported file accessible through > the list of buffers even if you don't want to jump to it. I second that. Because I use `midnight' to take care of useless buffers and `ido' does well on choosing buffers, leaving such a buffer open is not completely useless, if people have enough RAM. > > But I certainly wouldn't go for an option about this. > > What people think? I think it could be an option, if someone thinks he/she would use it. At the very least, we can have an option to keep our environment green. And a second thought on Xin's issue. I believe the one whom we should blame to is nXhtml mode, because if I understand correctly, his problem is that an additional window being created by nXhtml mode, when the html file is generated. So I would guess that even if the buffer is killed after the generation, that additional nXhtml window would still be there. Therefore, I would suggest that Xin disable the annoying/useless behaviour of nXhtml mode. Xiao-Yong -- c/* __o/* <\ * (__ */\ <