From: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [WISH] ELPA repo for org-mode?
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:38:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zkva204d.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81hbhynv05.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:51:46 +0530")
Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
> I think ELPA repository for orgmode-only packages (hosted where else but
> on worg) could be quite useful. The idea came up in emacs-devel [1].
AFAIU there are now three possible locations for Org extensions:
- the org-mode/contrib/lisp directory of Org's git repo
http://repo.or.cz/w/org-mode.git/tree/HEAD:/contrib/lisp
Those files are not included in Emacs, but are potential
candidates for org-mode/lisp and later inclusion.
- ELPA itself -- nothing prevents orgers to submit their
code there, if they follow the rules:
http://tromey.com/elpa/upload.html
- the World Wide Web.
The www isn't a bad solution provided things are correctly
listed somewhere - e.g. http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/
But clearly the ELPA and the org-mode/contrib/lisp are better
place for people who want to explore systematically and keep up
with the latest versions of those extensions.
I can see four scenarios:
1) more goes to org-mode/contrib/lisp: this is okay, but requires
more people to have write access to Org
2) have a separate Org contribs repo: then we can be more liberal
with write access and let users have all extensions in one pull.
3) migrate as much Org extensions as possible to ELPA: I'm still
trying to figure out what would be the consequences of this.
4) adopt OLGA (Org Lisp Gadget Archive) on orgmode.org: we would
need to adapt package.el for a custom ELPA-like on orgmode.org
but this is feasible. The advantage of having OLGA separately
from ELPA is that we might be more liberal about what extension
is allowed there.
Of course, we can combine (2) and (4): have a git repos containing
Org extensions (those who are not officially part of Emacs/Org) and
this repo can feed our OLGA, so that users can *also* navigate and
update Org extensions thru OLGA.
What people think?
--
Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-21 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 3:21 [WISH] ELPA repo for org-mode? Jambunathan K
2010-09-21 22:38 ` Bastien [this message]
2010-09-21 23:07 ` Scot Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zkva204d.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=kjambunathan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).