From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= <stepnem@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:39:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87zkrg600j.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin-VZAm9K5DOmRe0KKxQpxyW1aOWkKVbcgRDHM9@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ei8sae89.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43390 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PaAtp-0004TC-4u
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:42:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stepnem@gmail.com>) id 1PaAtn-0001RT-TC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:42:21 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:57342)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stepnem@gmail.com>) id 1PaAtn-0001RG-Kt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:42:19 -0500
Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so7718819fxm.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:42:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87ei8sae89.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 04 Jan 2011
	16:19:18 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Cc: Org-mode ml <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr> writes:

> Hi Torsten,
>
> Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Using [Orgmode] as a tag on the orgmode list is an arguable point.
>> Maybe the someone higher in the queue like to make a decision to
>> shorten it to [Org].
>
> I agreed this would be an improvement to use [Org].
>
> If nobody have a strong objection, I'll make this change in two days.

FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects
of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable
(e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike
[Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject:
header space.

I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that.

If you want to somehow treat the mails from this list specially, why
don't you filter on the presence of the mailing list address in the
headers, for example?

  =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n