From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: latex export issue
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:46:16 +0100
Message-ID: <87zkp326yf.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <E1PxRVg-0005Ef-Dt@ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32809 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxT5C-0001kj-4n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1PxT5A-0000zB-9C
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:46:22 -0500
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:49086)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1PxT5A-0000yv-4j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:46:20 -0500
Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1169159wyf.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:46:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E1PxRVg-0005Ef-Dt@ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk> (Stephen Eglen's
	message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:05:34 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Stephen Eglen <S.J.Eglen@damtp.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Stephen Eglen <S.J.Eglen@damtp.cam.ac.uk> writes:

> With the following minimal org buffer:
>
> Simple test
>
> here here here here here here here here here here here here here here
> 2010.  here here here here here here here here here here here here
> here here here here here here here here here here here here here here

> This is modified from a real case; is there any way that the "2010." can
> be interpreted as the end of the sentence rather than the start of a
> enumerate list?  (I have fixed it for now by reformatting my paragraph
> so that 2010 does not begin the line.)  I get similar behaviour with
> html export.

I usually suggest to insert a non-breakable space just after the
dot. Thus, the pattern doesn't match definition of a numbered list item
anymore.

Regards,

--
Nicolas