From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: indenting nested TODOs in agenda views Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:10:53 +0800 Message-ID: <87zkj0cx2a.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87ipppg0i2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8739gt4qyk.fsf@norang.ca> <87aab1fym8.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <80fwktaazj.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvn0n-00012F-6W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:11:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvn0l-0005Y8-Vi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:11:09 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvn0l-0005Y2-Qi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:11:07 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvn0l-0005yd-1E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:11:07 +0200 Received: from 123.115.198.185 ([123.115.198.185]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:11:07 +0200 Received: from eric by 123.115.198.185 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:11:07 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mon, Aug 22 2011, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22 2011, Bernt Hansen wrote: >> >>> Eric Abrahamsen writes: >>> >>>> What would it take to get an Agenda tags view that indented nested >>>> TODOs? I've always been bothered by the fact that nested TODOs within a >>>> subtree are all flattened for the agenda view, so sometimes it's hard to >>>> tell that several TODOs all belong to one "bigger" TODO. >>>> >>>> I guess it would have to go in `org-finalize-agenda-entries', after the >>>> filter function is run, and somehow instead of the way org entries are >>>> currently fed to the sorting function. Would this be a desirable option? >>> >>> Set >>> >>> (org-tags-match-list-sublevels 'indented) >>> >>> in your agenda view. >> >> That's pretty interesting, but not quite what I meant: I was thinking >> that TODOs would be first sorted by outline level, and then only TODOs >> that belonged to a subtree with "higher" TODOs would be indented. With >> "indented", a second-level TODO can come after a first-level TODO and >> appear to be subordinate to it, though they belong to completely >> different subtrees. >> >> But stating the problem this way makes me realize it's more complicated >> than I thought… > > Just an incentive to tell you I'd also would love that feature. > > Best regards, > Seb I'm going to have a whack at this, will probably take me a week or more… E