From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] ASCII back-end for new export engine Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:56:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87zkd9qmer.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87obtvk6j0.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtrel2z.fsf@gmail.com> <8739b2sctn.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5suqprx.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty3iuw4b.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bopps3nx.fsf@gmail.com> <20120127130647.GB54310@BigDog.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqmK5-0005Vh-KN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:58:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqmJz-0008Tr-Np for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:58:37 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:47649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqmJz-0008Tl-Gy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:58:31 -0500 Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so1415119wgb.30 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:58:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120127130647.GB54310@BigDog.local> (Rick Frankel's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:06:47 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Rick Frankel writes: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:58:26PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Achim Gratz writes: >> > Unless I miss something, if "num:*" would be allowed in addition to >> > integers, the LaTeX crowd would be pleased, no terribly new syntax would >> > be needed and all other backends could take note to skip numbering that >> > headline. Maybe one could throw in "nil" and "none" as an alias for >> > "*". >> >> I don't understand. What would "num:*" achieve? >> > > I think it's an attempt to be mnemonically similar to LaTeX -- > section* for an unnumbered section. I may be bold, but I still don't get it. "num:something" is a global option. We're talking about specifying _individually_ which headline wouldn't be numbered. How would a global option solve a local problem? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou