From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:09:38 +0100
Message-ID: <87zk2kyxml.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <877gpo1b16.fsf@gmail.com> <20121114153710.GA15676@c3po>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41449)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TYfbB-000569-9E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:14:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TYfb8-00054R-7D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:13:57 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:44105)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TYfb8-00054N-0n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:13:54 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c10so2408178wiw.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:13:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20121114153710.GA15676@c3po> (Toby Cubitt's message of "Wed, 14
	Nov 2012 16:37:10 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Toby Cubitt <tsc25@cantab.net> writes:

> I can easily allow org-time-clocksum-fractional-format to be a list of
> formats. But "1d 3.4h" doesn't seem very useful to me. Probably it should
> work a bit differently: format the time as a fractional quantity, using
> the largest time unit which will give a non-zero integer part.
>
> Does that sound reasonable?

That's the idea, yes. Though, it will be the largest time unit _with
a format string_ which will give a non-zero integer part.

> OK, but in this case I think the single-format-string option is still
> useful. It gives users a simpler way of customizing the format if they
> don't want to do anything fancy.

If they don't want to do anything fancy, they use the default value,
whatever it may be. ;) I don't mind keeping the single format string
option anyway.

> I'll post an updated patch when I get time to make the changes.

Since it's for 8.0, there's no hurry. I'll wait for you to merge the two
patches and make subsequent changes.

Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou