From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: babel perl issue Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:36:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87zk1lu53s.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87a9tntr29.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87sj7fp7om.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqwrrml2.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87vcca9bxw.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2yhvm3c.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87obi193mn.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36503) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti8DX-0007YY-B0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:36:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti8DU-0005sC-AF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:36:39 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti8DU-0005rq-4M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:36:36 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti8Dd-0003gL-IE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:36:45 +0100 Received: from pd9eb26c4.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.38.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:36:45 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb26c4.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:36:45 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Schulte writes: > So, you're suggesting moving all ob-* defcustoms into ob.el or possibly > into org.el? That seems reasonable to me, although I'm hesitant to add > that much code to org.el w/o a go-ahead from Bastien or a more core > maintainer than myself. That would be a possibility, but adding them to a new file ob-customs.el and requiring that from ob.el might be less intrusive. > Specifically to the require structure of Babel. Perhaps the best > solution would be to replace ob.el with a small file which requires all > of the core components of Babel (e.g., ob-exp, ob-ref, ob-tangle, > etc...) and move the existing ob.el to something like ob-core.el. That > way the entire Babel suite may be loaded by all language specific files > using a single require statement. Does that seem reasonable? If you can manage to keep the require structure non-circular, that seems like a good idea. You could also turn your suggestion on the head and provide ob-core.el with just the requires (and maybe the defcustoms) you mentioned above and have all other ob-* files require it. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves