From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: aaronecay@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] attr_latex in new exporter
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:38:17 -0500
Message-ID: <87zjydkd12.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m18v5y8qn3.fsf@tsdye.com> <87k3pi18pf.fsf@gmail.com>
	<m1obetbz8d.fsf@tsdye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39563)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1UE1FQ-0000tr-ST
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:38:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1UE1FL-0003J7-Pv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:38:24 -0500
Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d]:54847)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1UE1FL-0003Ip-LB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:38:19 -0500
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id b12so647400qca.18
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:38:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m1obetbz8d.fsf@tsdye.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

Hi Thomas,

I think the following patch (on top of current master) will fix the
problem:
-----cut-here-----
diff --git c/lisp/ox-latex.el w/lisp/ox-latex.el
index d17dd60..eefb272 100644
--- c/lisp/ox-latex.el
+++ w/lisp/ox-latex.el
@@ -1811,9 +1811,9 @@ used as a communication channel."
 	 ;; It is possible to specify width and height in the
 	 ;; ATTR_LATEX line, and also via default variables.
 	 (width (format "%s" (cond ((plist-get attr :width))
-				   ((eq float 'figure) "0.7\\textwidth")
+                                   ((plist-get attr :height) "")
+                                   ((eq float 'figure) "0.7\\textwidth")
 				   ((eq float 'wrap) "0.48\\textwidth")
-				   ((plist-get attr :height) "")
 				   (t org-latex-image-default-width))))
 	 (height (format "%s" (cond ((plist-get attr :height))
 				    ((or (plist-get attr :width)
-----cut-here-----

Nicolas, I=E2=80=99m not sure I understand the logic behind (memq float '(f=
igure
wrap)) in the cond for setting height.  I think that it would be very
rare for someone to set the default height to something other than "",
but in the event that the user does so I don=E2=80=99t see why it shoudl ma=
ke a
difference whether the image is floating or not.

--=20
Aaron Ecay