From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: [PATCH] export to various flavors of (X)HTML Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:26:52 -0700 Message-ID: <87zjwfnzwj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87y5cdkiuj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <20130423010019.GA65517@BigDog.local> <87sj2h3m3s.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86wqrtwisf.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <517732AF.6080308@gmail.com> <86y5c82hxy.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <871u9ytihc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8f433f7c2e7d4892d6286afc9524d9a6@mail.rickster.com> <87li85tdsm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <20130426184949.GB79236@BigDog.local> <87bo8xeuxd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXNb4-0005Vz-Dh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:20:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXNb0-0000hc-6P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:20:46 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXNaz-0000hW-WD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:20:42 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UXNay-0001LG-5M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 05:20:40 +0200 Received: from 63.226.249.211 ([63.226.249.211]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 05:20:40 +0200 Received: from eric by 63.226.249.211 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 05:20:40 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rick Frankel writes: > Whoops. Wrong key. Patch actually attached to this email... > rick Great, I'll consolidate all these -- would it be better to mush them into one big patch, or to keep them separate (I suppose for ease of rollback, if something goes wrong)? E