From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC]: Uniform indentation for lists
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:08:36 +0530
Message-ID: <87zjudo59v.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87hagntblh.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20130625094456.GA3680@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41213)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1UrhTo-0003VQ-P1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:37:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1UrhTn-0005dq-RT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:37:16 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::230]:58048)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1UrhTn-0005dW-Al
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:37:15 -0400
Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ma3so13511943pbc.7
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130625094456.GA3680@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> (Suvayu Ali's
	message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:44:56 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:

> I think it will still break for long lists (greater than 9 items).
>
> 9 item
> 10 item

There wouldn't be any long lists.  All items will be numbered 1.