From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: [bug?][ob-core] using remove-if
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:56:01 +0200
Message-ID: <87zjt46f32.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <87d2q07vsk.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvuwuc04.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50025)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1V3yEW-0003dH-HX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:56:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1V3yEP-0003WQ-7i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:56:12 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:57539)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1V3yEO-0003WG-Ul
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:56:05 -0400
Received: from pank ([85.178.251.250]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with
	ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLR30-1V3Q003EOI-000fy9 for
	<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:56:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87fvuwuc04.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Mon, 29
	Jul 2013 18:28:43 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: schulte.eric@gmail.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:

> Thanks for catching this, I've just pushed up a fix.

Thanks for the quick fix!  I'll go back to async export :)

> To complain to no-one in particular for a second...
>
>   The exclusion of the cl functions from Emacs packages including both
>   functions like `remove-if', and basic macros like `flet', has one of
>   two possible consequences.  Either (1) authors work around the missing
>   functionality by contorting the logic of their code so as to not need
>   this functionality, or (2) the function is re-implemented with a
>   package specific prefix and often slightly different semantics.  I
>   know I've had to do both in my own Org-mode coding, and I believe most
>   major packages do both of these [1].

It does seem a bit silly.  Wasn't work done on making cl-lib faster?
And would that get e.g. remove-if from cl-seq?

Cheers,
Rasmus

-- 
I hear there's rumors on the, uh, Internets. . .