From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Internal Links <<>> In a table
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 01:20:11 +0200
Message-ID: <87zjj3oh90.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <loom.20140430T001612-190@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49192)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1WfHJW-0005lp-E2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:19:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1WfHJO-0006qH-HK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:19:50 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]:46504)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1WfHJO-0006qC-AF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:19:42 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hm4so83560wib.4
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20140430T001612-190@post.gmane.org> (Luke Crook's message
	of "Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:42:10 +0000 (UTC)")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Luke Crook <luke@balooga.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Luke Crook <luke@balooga.com> writes:

> I just noticed that <<>> links in tables <<Ref1>>, <<Ref2>> below do not 
> increment, whereas <<>> links in lists do.  Example below.
>
>
> * Reference Documents
> | Reference     | Document Description |
> |---------------+----------------------|
> | <<Ref1>>Ref-1 | Ref 1                |
> | <<Ref2>>Ref-2 | Ref 2                |
> | <<Ref3>>Ref-3 | Ref 3                |
> | <<Ref4>>Ref-4 | Ref 4                |
> | <<Ref5>>Ref-5 | Ref 5                |

This is expected. Targets in tables return table number, but only among
captioned tables. Otherwise, the returned value is undefined.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou