From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Seeking advice on a worg contribution
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:30:05 +0100
Message-ID: <87zjivgy9u.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <c28a69bf-6161-4fde-8201-139e8f4bc251@dewdrop-world.net>
	<87ha545f89.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<f4d6444a-92b3-4378-ab2a-8c8640c2c8ef@dewdrop-world.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52250)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Whb5u-0002qX-Fs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 04:51:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Whb5m-0007Q0-Mn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 04:51:22 -0400
Received: from mail-am1lp0016.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([213.199.154.16]:8356
	helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Whb5m-0007PW-Gg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 04:51:14 -0400
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: James Harkins <jamshark70@gmail.com>
Cc: orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Tuesday,  6 May 2014 at 10:17, James Harkins wrote:

[...]

> Let's assume I'm an HTML idiot (which is true...). Is it really true,
> according to [1], that the only way to add this CSS class definition
> is to put it in a separate file and link it? It seems to be the only
> *documented* method.

No, you can put definitions in the org file directly as part of the HTML
header, as in this example which changes the behaviour for the whole
document body and how figures are presented:

#+begin_src org
  ,#+HTML_HEAD: <style type="text/css"><!-- 
  ,#+HTML_HEAD:  body { font-family: sans; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.4em; }
  ,#+HTML_HEAD:  div.figure { font-size: 10pt; font-style: italic; }
  ,#+HTML_HEAD: --></style>
#+end_src

You will be able to define the CSS for your code block caption in a
similar way.

eric

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.1, Org release_8.2.6-937-g60502a