From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [patch, ox] #+INCLUDE resolves links
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:29:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87zjdh89ll.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87k34x6bjd.fsf@gmx.us> <87lhpdurfh.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87bnq984hd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnq5zzp7.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87oau4ems5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d2af1qyv.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87tx3po7kj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw9hcsy9.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37226)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XYyR7-0003As-P6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:30:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XYyR0-0004Ie-DF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:29:53 -0400
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:43443)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XYyR0-0004IU-70
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:29:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87mw9hcsy9.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 30 Sep
	2014 12:18:22 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> It's two extra words and maybe it's helpful to make the concept clear
> to people unfamilar with org-element.  The statement "contents of the
> requested element", while technically clear, is only barely
> comprehensible for the uninvited.
>
> However, it's only tweo extra words, so I'm happy to remove them if
> you have strong feeling about this.

I have no strong feeling. Though, I admit the "etc" these two words
imply annoys me. Anyway, you will be the final judge.

> I don't know what you mean with regular.  Anyway, my reasoning is that
> this INCLUDE-command
>
>         #+INCLUDE: "/tmp/test0.org" :my-random-prop "foo"
>
> Will give me something like:
>
> \#+\textsc{begin}\(_{\text{my}}\)-random-prop
> \section{test0}
> \label{sec-2}
> 1
> \#+\textsc{end}\(_{\text{my}}\)-random-prop
>
> In casual testing similar stuff happened when I did not remove the
> match.  It could have been it was a bit too casual and that I
> misspelling the property.  I will test this properly later.

OK. I wait for your report.


Regards,