From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: org-latex-fragments on sections Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:52:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87zj7v62gj.fsf@gmx.us> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSOuI-00024d-C1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:53:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSOuE-0005ax-5e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:53:05 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSOuD-0005an-Va for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:53:02 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YSOu7-0003Hz-C6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:52:55 +0100 Received: from 46.166.188.220 ([46.166.188.220]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:52:55 +0100 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.188.220 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:52:55 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Andreas Leha writes: > I just add that the behaviour is not as expected also when the prefixed > command (C-u C-c C-x C-l) is used. > [...] > unfortunately when my maker is at point > > ** section 1.1 > > the command org-preview-latex-fragment (C-c C-x C-l) has no effect. I can't reproduce in neither Org 8.2 nor 8.3 using emacs -q. When I put the cursor on ** section 1.1 and do C-u C-c C-x C-l I get the desired fragments, i.e. section 1.1.1 and 1.1.2. —Rasmus -- It was you, Jezebel, it was you