From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: another example of org being slow, with some analysis
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:19:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87zj3v3hnu.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87ioalhtfa.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
	<87vbekc1iy.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com>
	<877fr0w78d.fsf@gelnhausen.dvs.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
	<87wpz016gd.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87k2uz953g.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53533)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z5xMv-0004Qk-IV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:34:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z5xMp-000303-GP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:34:09 -0400
Received: from mail-am1on0127.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([157.56.112.127]:10848
	helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z5xMp-0002z5-7d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:34:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k2uz953g.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message
	of "Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:53:55 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Friday, 19 Jun 2015 at 09:53, Nick Dokos wrote:

[...]

> What is the setting of cache-long-scans you are using? Does it differ
> on the two laptops?
>
> Ivan Andrus suggested setting it to nil, but it seems that for this
> case, leaving it at t (the default) should be much faster. But there
> may be a bug in the cache code.

It's the default (t) in both cases.  My emacs initialisation is the same
on all of my systems and I didn't even know about this setting!

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-1231-ga0a883