From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Malakhovski <oxij@oxij.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] ob-calc: don't leave garbage on the stack
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:24:36 +0000
Message-ID: <87ziytlrd7.fsf@yin.lan>
References: <1446581747-1960-1-git-send-email-oxij@oxij.org>
	<1446581747-1960-10-git-send-email-oxij@oxij.org>
	<87fv0mvw5k.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8qum14d.fsf@yin.lan>
	<87y4edvncd.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52812)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <oxij@oxij.org>) id 1ZtzvX-0003Ay-Pk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:24:44 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <oxij@oxij.org>) id 1ZtzvT-0003ZZ-T6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:24:43 -0500
Received: from fujibayashi-1-pt.tunnel.tserv10.par1.ipv6.he.net
	([2001:470:1f12:446::2]:46831 helo=tricoro.koumakan.jp)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <oxij@oxij.org>) id 1ZtzvT-0003ZR-N0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:24:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87y4edvncd.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:

> Ok.  Then:
> 1. The indentation is wrong, because (calc-pop 1) is the second argument
>    to calc-eval.
> 2. The prog1 form is not needed, because it only wraps a single form
>    (the calc-eval call).
>
> This looks wrong to me, so please double-check.

Ah, I misunderstood. You are correct about parens indeed. Fixed, ok. Why
it wored as expected I have no idea.