From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: regression in list/heading toggling? Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:37:49 +0800 Message-ID: <87zixko102.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <871tax5lxl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87egewn8a6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Thv-0003r4-Ji for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:38:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Thq-0005w8-KN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:38:15 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Thq-0005w2-DR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:38:10 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Thk-0000fy-TK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 02:38:05 +0100 Received: from 125.33.229.221 ([125.33.229.221]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 02:38:04 +0100 Received: from eric by 125.33.229.221 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 02:38:04 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I've found what seems to be a bug in org-ctrl-c-star, toggling a >> numbered list item to a proper heading. ECM is simply emacs -Q, make an >> org buffer, put in the text: >> >> 1. >> >> cursor on the number, then "C-c *". Text is removed, the window jumps, >> and you get "(wrong-type-argument arrayp nil)". >> >> I have a full traceback I can send to the list if necessary, but my >> guess is it will be fairly reproduceable! > > Fixed. Thank you. Thanks, as always, for the speedy response!