From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [lint] imagemagick
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:02:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87zix9qfsz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <olulh8tjh2c.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<878u4trvlt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<olu8u4tjfji.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58276)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a9a2n-0004ik-Ub
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:00:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a9a2e-0004e7-L4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:00:37 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:42433)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a9a2e-0004e1-Bc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:00:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <olu8u4tjfji.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> (Andreas Leha's message
	of "Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:49:53 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> I am not sure about the possible values, though.  babel header arguments
> usually take 'yes' and 'no' as values for TRUE and FALSE.

Which is, IMO, a mistake. Lisp has already some definition of TRUE and
FALSE which is not language-centric.

> Examples are :tangle, :comments, etc. So, I have been using
> ':imagemagick yes' until now.
>
> But on the other hand ':imagemagick no' is not doing the expected
> thing.

I looked at the source and every time, :imagemagick is treated as
a boolean, so "yes" and "no" are equivalent to t.

At least, the declaration seems on par with the source.

Regards,