From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: babel result chain outdated/inconsistent using var
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:54:41 +0200
Message-ID: <87zit6c2y6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87k2kbzzzzrlna@me.localhost.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58202)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1anmwq-00077Y-F8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:52:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1anmwn-00012n-8k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:52:40 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:56600)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1anmwn-00012f-24
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:52:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k2kbzzzzrlna@me.localhost.invalid> (Daniele Pizzolli's message
	of "Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:01:45 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Daniele Pizzolli <dan@toel.it>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Daniele Pizzolli <dan@toel.it> writes:

> is possible to update the =E2=80=9C#+RESULTS: pid=E2=80=9D when the block=
 =E2=80=9C#+NAME:
> echo-pid=E2=80=9D is evaluated in the following snippet?

Without `org-babel-execute-buffer', I don't think so.

> This will lead to a consistent document generation with =E2=80=9CM-x
> org-babel-execute-buffer=E2=80=9D or by hitting =E2=80=9CC-c C-c=E2=80=9D=
 on =E2=80=9C#+NAME:
> echo-pid=E2=80=9D.

I'm not convinced that this behaviour should be enforced. If I C-c C-c
on a block, I expect only the results of the block to be updated, not
some other part of the document I am editing.=20

Also, what if the other block is in another document? I don't think it
should be updated either.

What is the harm in using `org-babel-execute-buffer' for your use case?

Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Goaziou