From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-export-with-broken-links doesn't apply to footnotes
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 22:44:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87ziqd9cn7.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
References: <CAMsBe8qePAcqSt84yz=d6bOq4aT84B4s2anju6dXMaLqXLXsGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39000)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bFp16-0004Gn-BB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:44:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bFp13-0000xs-2b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:44:56 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:43909)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bFp12-0000xi-RE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:44:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMsBe8qePAcqSt84yz=d6bOq4aT84B4s2anju6dXMaLqXLXsGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Mark Edgington's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:25:23 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark Edgington <edgimar@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Mark Edgington <edgimar@gmail.com> writes:

> I have noticed, however, that even if I have (setq
> org-export-with-broken-links 't), I am still unable to export a
> narrowed buffer that contains a footnote reference ("Definition not
> found for footnote...").  Is this behavior intentional?

No, it isn't. However I could only reproduce it with empty footnote
definitions.

In any case, this is now fixed. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou