From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-table: Can't assign numbers to range
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:43:36 +0100
Message-ID: <87zihtr1zb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <2017-02-08T16-23-32@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<878tperpwg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<2017-02-10T18-03-50@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51272)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ccLmv-0007Lf-3t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:43:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ccLmu-0000KZ-1D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:43:41 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:46364)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1ccLmt-0000JK-RQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:43:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2017-02-10T18-03-50@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (Karl Voit's message
	of "Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:04:38 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at>
Cc: Karl Voit <news1142@Karl-Voit.at>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:

> * Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

>> Because "@I$1..@II$1" is not as obvious as you may think at first
>> thought. As a consequence, it is forbidden.
>
> Hm. So is it true that I can't come up with a formula that fills up
> the cells with those integers except cell-by-cell?

Not if you can come up with a left-hand side that doesn't refer to
@I or @II.

Regards,