From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:13:19 +0100
Message-ID: <87zhe37ub4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <Lxbf_R2--3-2@kisaragi-hiu.com> <87k168exr2.fsf@kyleam.com>
 <LxixqDw--3-2@kisaragi-hiu.com>
 <BFBDE2D3-8F97-435E-8448-7BA60E2E98BD@traduction-libre.org>
 <877e23slod.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36545)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1ixUEm-00089I-5g
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:13:24 -0500
In-Reply-To: <877e23slod.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
 "Tue, 07 Jan 2020 09:41:38 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org>, Emacs Orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Jean-Christophe,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> I'm not sure would be pertinent to create a whole section for duration
> format: these are not quite as ubiquitous as timestamps. However, they
> are used here and there so it may be better to add a few words in the
> appropriate sections, the main one being obviously "Effort Estimates".
>
> Anyway, patches welcome! :)

would you be willing to follow Nicolas' suggestion and send a patch
to enhance the "Effort Estimates" section?

Thanks in advance,

-- 
 Bastien