From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
To: Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com>
Cc: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python?
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 07:32:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgceusxw.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rkslztg.fsf@gmail.com> (Jack Kamm's message of "Thu, 03 Nov 2022 10:20:43 -0700")
Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com> writes:
> If python-mode support is removed, I'd be willing to help create a new
> ob-python-mode package
Indeed. A suggestion: can you or Ihor send a help request to the
list, explaining the issue at hand and asking if someone wants to
create and maintain ob-python-mode.el?
This way we can refer to this email on the list when announcing that
ob-python.el do not support python-mode.el anymore.
--
Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-26 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 3:11 [BUG] ob-python: async session evaluation does not support python-mode.el [9.6-pre (release_9.5.5-2661-g2d040b.dirty @ /home/yantar92/.emacs.d/straight/build/org/)] Ihor Radchenko
2022-11-02 4:26 ` Jack Kamm
2022-11-03 7:08 ` [DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python? (was: [BUG] ob-python: async session evaluation does not support python-mode.el [9.6-pre (release_9.5.5-2661-g2d040b.dirty @ /home/yantar92/.emacs.d/straight/build/org/)]) Ihor Radchenko
2022-11-03 17:20 ` Jack Kamm
2022-11-26 6:32 ` Bastien [this message]
2022-11-26 10:03 ` [DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python? Ihor Radchenko
2022-11-26 10:32 ` Bastien
2022-11-26 2:29 ` [DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python? (was: [BUG] ob-python: async session evaluation does not support python-mode.el [9.6-pre (release_9.5.5-2661-g2d040b.dirty @ /home/yantar92/.emacs.d/straight/build/org/)]) Ihor Radchenko
2022-11-26 5:55 ` [DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python? Bastien Guerry
2022-12-29 13:41 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-29 14:21 ` Bastien
2023-01-22 22:21 ` Jack Kamm
2023-01-23 11:22 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-27 23:13 ` Jack Kamm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgceusxw.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=bzg@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=jackkamm@gmail.com \
--cc=yantar92@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).