Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>]

Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

>> The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog,
>
> A blog with a couple of posts a year has a little sense. Moreover it is 
> closer to a wiki article because it is supposed to be updated. That is 
> why I asked for an alternative location on Worg for bonus or extra 
> material for the manual.

I have no idea about alternative location.
Maybe someone more familiar with WORG. Bastien?

>> FAQ is probably fine. We may add a CSS there that will fold the
>> answers by default.
>
> When all entries are opened, it is possible to use search in browser. I 
> am against the idea of hiding answers. However the table of contents, 
> that is rather long and revealed on hover only, makes it harder to 
> search in the TOC at first.

Maybe we can add a proper TOC at the top? Or convert the on-hover TOC
into proper one. TOC on top + detailed answers is how many FAQ pages are
designed.

> I have tried a random query "org-mode renumber footnotes" that is quite 
> close to an entry from the document. Nether Google nor Bing offered FAQ 
> on first 2 pages of search results. So FAQ is not friendly to search 
> engines for some reasons. I am unsure if the rank may be improved by 
> e.g. microdata schema.org attributes.

I wish we had somebody who is familiar with these things. I personally
have no idea what can be wrong and where to start to solve this problem.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>