Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
Okay. Is there a way to tighten these inputs further? I have them set to :any for the moment, but I wonder if there is a way to leverage the values for `geiser-repl-default-host` and `geiser-repl-default-port`.Hunter Jozwiak <hunter.t.joz@gmail.com> writes:Here is a patch that provides this functionality.Thank you!^^^^^^^^^ argumentsSubject: [PATCH] org-mode: allow ob-scheme to accept a remote connection.* lisp/org/ob-scheme.el (org-babel-scheme-get-repl): introduce two optional variables host and port. If there are not given, just run* lisp/org/ob-scheme (org-babel-scheme-execute-with-geiser, org-babel-execute:scheme): take these optional arguments into account.… and add two new optional arguments.@@ -231,6 +235,8 @@ org-babel-execute:scheme geiser-scheme-implementation geiser-default-implementation (car geiser-active-implementations))) + (host (cdr (assq :host params))) + (port (cdr (assq :port params)))Please declare these new scheme-specific header argument in `org-babel-header-args:scheme'. See `org-babel-header-args:C' for an example. This is necessary for header argument completion to work.
Sure thing; I can do that after I finish this message.Also, please document the new header argument in the ob-scheme documentation at https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-scheme.html (you can submit a patch against https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg/tree/master/item/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-scheme.org )
Is there a way to test this and pinpoint the problem? I'm not familiar with using :sessions. Here is what I tested so far:- (and (not (string= session "none")) session)))) ; session + (and (not (string= session "none")) session) host port))) ; sessionThis does not look right. Your change will disable session support completely when host and port are not provided.
#+begin_src scheme :scheme guile :host localhost :port 37146 :session *image* (use-modules (gnu) (guix) (guix gexp)) #+end_src #+begin_src scheme :host localhost :port 37146 :session *image* (use-service-modules sound) (use-package-modules linux) #+end_src #+begin_src scheme :scheme guile :session *other* (use-srfis '(26)) #+end_src
This particular test gave me two REPLS. In the *image*
REPL, I have access to the packages and services I would need to build part of the current project I am working on. The other REPL gives me access to the `cut` and `cute` macros, and there isn't any plution between the two. Is there something else I'm missing here?