Re: Re: Organize Your Life In Plain Text!

[Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>]

I like the idea of publishing the sources.

Shouldn't we do something like this on worg too?

It's amazing to see the too files side by side - both perfectly
readable - visible simplicity and a great source of examples for
(potentially new) users.

BTW: it would be real fun to tranform links for this purpose, so that
visitors could browse the published org sources just like in emacs.



We could as well this here

[[http://repo.or.cz/w/Worg.git?a=blob;f=org-tutorials/org-publish-html-tutorial.org][Source
of this file]]


Maybe in the tutorial index (e.g.)?


...

* Publishing org to html
#+ATTR_HTML: title="See sources of that file (git repo on repo.or.cz)"
[[http://repo.or.cz/w/Worg.git?a=blob;f=org-tutorials/org-publish-html-tutorial.org][(src)]]

....


   Sebastian


Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> writes:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On May 13, 2009, at 3:50 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> Rick Moynihan <rick.moynihan@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Another comment (and this goes for many documents published in
>>>> org-mode) is that it would be nice if the HTML file could link to an
>>>> online copy of the raw org file.
>>>
>>> More thoughts along this line...
>>>
>>> The only downside of doing this automatically is if you
>>> include :noexport: tags or COMMENT on headlines to prevent export (say
>>> you have information you don't want out on the net.
>>>
>>> I wouldn't want the source file automatically published always.  I'm
>>> like to be able to control that from some org-publish configuration.
>>
>> I guess it would be relatively easy to write a function
>> `org-publish-org-to-org' which would remove these sensitive
>> parts and could be used as as :publishing-function in a setup
>
> That works for me :)  I prefer to post my source with the published
> files for most things -- my old publishing method (before switching to
> org-mode) used to do that (without the noexport options -- since it had
> no concept of not publishing everything).
>
> -Bernt