From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: HTML5 presentations Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:29:48 -0700 Message-ID: <87y611bmmr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871uz54diw.fsf@member.fsf.org> <4DFA5480.1070502@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIGL-0004pK-Vw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:29:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIGK-0005Mi-3U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:29:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:47012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXIGJ-0005Md-Ie for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:29:55 -0400 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so1615362pzk.0 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:29:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DFA5480.1070502@sift.info> (Robert Goldman's message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:07:44 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: rpgoldman@sift.info Cc: Org Mode Robert Goldman writes: > On 6/7/11 Jun 7 -3:01 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: >> Vinh Nguyen writes: >> >>> After the recent org-mode to S5 discussion, I stumbled onto >>> [these](https://gist.github.com/509761) code. It offers a way to >>> export org files to HTML5 presentations. I think it looks quite nice. >>> I see it being better than S5 in that no "ui" folder is required. >>> What do you all think? Is it worthy of being incorporated into >>> org-mode? >> >> Just tried it, and it's pretty cool! Easy to use and nicely looking. >> >> Bye, >> Tassilo >> >> >> > > I have tried the version here: > https://github.com/twada/org-html5presentation.el > > and it does not seem to be ready for prime-time. Org-babel features > don't work, and there seems to be not a clear integration with the > org-export-preprocessor. See my two issues, one (not satisfactorily) > closed, one open. > > Possibly this should be folded into contrib, so that people could > cooperate on it more easily than when it lives off in a separate git > repo, but it shouldn't be enabled for the unwary until it's been > thoroughly exercised. > > Is there a "tries to use all features" org presentation somewhere that > would serve as a good acid test for an export facility? It would be > very handy to have that. > This export target seems to re-implement much of the org HTML export mechanics which is most likely the reason for the incomplete coverage of Org's large functionality. Perhaps it would be possible to change this so that it works more like org-s5, that is, so that it firsts exports using the existing html export functionality, and then simply manipulates the resulting html. Best -- Eric -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/