From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:22:38 +0200
Message-ID: <87y5wemt4h.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com>
	<30891.1319141196@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<87fwinifqu.fsf@gmail.com>
	<32184.1319143892@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<808vofwf1w.fsf@somewhere.org> <87y5wfgwn7.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45183)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RHE8o-00074Y-Fp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:24:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RHE8m-0001oP-KW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:24:02 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:44521)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RHE8m-0001oK-EV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:24:00 -0400
Received: by wyg34 with SMTP id 34so4667339wyg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87y5wfgwn7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Thu, 20
	Oct 2011 15:50:52 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:

> There are currently a number of instances of synonymous keywords when
> dealing with code blocks, specifically.
>
>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
>

- Cases [1] and [2] : I'd suggest to drop all of them and to use "name",
  shared by both source code and data. Is it really different to name
  a source block or a list?

- Case [3] : I like "call". "lob" is too cryptic.

> Are there cases where we want to continue to allow synonyms (e.g., in
> named data so that "results" can be used for code block results but
> "data" can be used for hand-written data)?

No. One Keyword to name them all.

Regards,

[1] DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 1

[2] DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 3

[3] DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 2

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou